The airport company announced on 8 May 2012 that the opening date of 3 June 2012 would need to be postponed since completion of the safety systems, and their subsequent structural approval, could no longer be accomplished by the planned opening date. As reported, the BER planners had decided to complete a partially automated version of the fire protection and control system by 3 June as a transitional solution, and to introduce a fully-automated system over the following months.

Following a letter of 9 May from the Building Standards Authority to the airport operating company, however, this time-saving option was no longer viable. This was subsequently reported to the Supervisory Board by BER planners. The letter stated: “A further application for use of the terminal with interim measures, such as a man-machine interface, will not be successful.” In view of this statement from the authorities, the airport can only commence operations with a fully automated fire safety and control system as originally planned. According to the BER planners, pending work on the fire safety and control system, and operational ramp-up of its central component – so-called System 14 – will take until December 2012.

The new timeline is set to minimise the risk that the time available for inspections, approvals and certifications could potentially be insufficient. In addition, the risk would be too high to move the airport in winter due to adverse weather leading to operational restrictions. The Supervisory Board therefore followed the recommendation of the management and decided that all construction work should be completed first before the remaining necessary steps are taken that will allow the airport to commence operations. These steps entail the so-called impact and complex inspection by certified experts, subsequent inspection by the Building Standards Authority, further trial runs, designation of the airport site as a security area, and delivery of goods to storage facilities, shops and restaurants.

In the course of the Supervisory Board meeting, criticism was levelled at the BER planners’ risk management. The Board concluded that the risks to a timely opening posed by the late completion of the ambitious fire safety and control system had been underestimated. The situation had become more and more challenging as some construction works were behind schedule, while planning, scheduled building works, staff training and trial runs continued simultaneously. Some scenarios could therefore not be tested as planned during the trial runs. Interruptions to trial runs occurred repeatedly as a result of construction work (e.g. due to electricity being used by construction workers which resulted in check-in islands not running properly). A further issue was the lack of reliability of certain systems, particularly in parts of the data technology and safety equipment (e.g. WLAN networks, fire-alarm system, door controls).

During the discussions about the reasons for postponing the opening date, the decision was reached that the Managing Director Operations/BBI, Dr. Manfred Körtgen, will have to leave the company. Körtgen joined the airport company in 2004 as Director of BBI Planning and Construction. He was head of the planning team and was responsible for the setting up the team responsible for the construction of the new airport. From September 2008, as Managing Director Operations/BBI, he was in charge of the construction of Berlin Brandenburg Airport. Until a new Managing Director Operations/BBI joins the company, the CEO Professor Rainer Schwarz will be temporarily in charge of the department.

At the same time the Supervisory Board decided to terminate the contract with pg bbi. pg bbi, which is the project management company and in charge of site supervision, and comprises J.S.K. International Architekten und Ingenieure GmbH and gmp Generalplanungsgesellschaft mbH.

Source and photo: Berlin Brandenburg Airport

CEO Mehdorn: Damage to Berlin’s image is intolerable

airberlin CEO Hartmut Mehdorn reacted with sharp criticism to the announcement that the Berlin-Brandenburg BER airport will not open until 17th March 2013. “This is totally unacceptable and does almost irreparable and therefore intolerable reputational damage to Berlin as an airport hub.” The flight schedule with the planned long-haul destinations which were to start in winter can scarcely be implemented. The same applies to additional planned destinations overseas. With much difficulty, we would have accepted the BER postponement to October; this would have been possible only with great effort and expenditure. But this latest decision will have a deep impact on the business operations of the market leader.
“We have promised to provide our passengers, our oneworld® alliance and our strategic partner Etihad Airways with good service even during the transition in Berlin. This has now been postponed indefinitely. Instead, we must continue with the much too small, completely inappropriate Tegel Airport.” The postponement hits airberlin a lot harder than the other airlines that fly to Berlin. airberlin, with a market share of around 33 percent, is the only airline with a hub and thus a growing number of connecting passengers in Berlin. The proportion of connecting passengers last summer reached 23 percent. The planned construction of a hub, wherein six daily waves of airberlin planes could approach Berlin from all directions and passengers could quickly transfer and continue flying, was tailored to BER and is hardly feasible at Tegel.
Mehdorn: “The postponement of the opening by several months is no longer explicable purely based on fire protection measures. As a result, we incur not only an economic loss but also damage to our hub’s image, which is financially incalculable.”